Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: Antonio Macchi <antonio_macchi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:43:33 +0200
why does *everybody* use 192.168.0.1, and not simpler 10.0.0.1?
They don't.
not true... every examples in books use 192.168
the defaults of my router is 192.168
honestly... they do
Perhaps for someone who don't really understand IP adressing. And if that is the case, s/he probably shouldn't be messing with it in the first place.
well... perhaps...
--
~
. .
/V\
/ \
/( )\
^'~'^
Un uomo è libero nel momento in cui desidera esserlo. (Voltaire)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: bgeer
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: KR
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- References:
- 192.168 - why?
- From: Antonio Macchi
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: KR
- 192.168 - why?
- Prev by Date: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Next by Date: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Previous by thread: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Next by thread: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|