Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: KR <kristian.rasmussen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:52:39 +0200
Antonio Macchi wrote:
not true... every examples in books use 192.168
the defaults of my router is 192.168
honestly... they do
The router from my ISP uses 10.0.0.0/24, and there's at least two other ISPs in this area that do the same.
Note that they still use a 24-bit netmask, so the network has 254 available IP addressesm just like a 192.168.0.0/24 net would have. And why not? What's the point in having an huge address space if you're only ever going to use a tiny fraction of it?
(Also, if everybody used 10.0.0.0/8 both at home and at work, it would be slightly problematic to get VPNs working.)
KR
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: Antonio Macchi
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- References:
- 192.168 - why?
- From: Antonio Macchi
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: KR
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: Antonio Macchi
- 192.168 - why?
- Prev by Date: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Next by Date: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Previous by thread: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Next by thread: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|