Re: 192.168 - why?

In comp.os.linux.networking, Antonio Macchi wrote:

available IP addressesm just like a 192.168.0.0/24 net would have. And
why not? What's the point in having an huge address space if you're only
ever going to use a tiny fraction of it?

it's right, but you can can use 10.0.0.0/24 too....

and, very important, 10.0.0.0 is more more easy to digit/learn/remeber
than 192.168... or 172.16

Oh. So your real issue is that /you/ have problems remembering the 192.168
and 172.16 prefixes.

And for this, you advocate that /everyone else/ should change?

Good luck with that
--
Lew Pitcher

Master Codewright & JOAT-in-training | Registered Linux User #112576
http://pitcher.digitalfreehold.ca/ | GPG public key available by request
---------- Slackware - Because I know what I'm doing. ------


.