Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:48:14 -0600
Antonio Macchi <antonio_macchi@xxxxxxxx> writes:
available IP addressesm just like a 192.168.0.0/24 net would
have. And why not? What's the point in having an huge address space
if you're only ever going to use a tiny fraction of it?
it's right, but you can can use 10.0.0.0/24 too....
and, very important, 10.0.0.0 is more more easy to digit/learn/remeber
than 192.168... or 172.16
Please tell me you're joking.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: Cork Soaker
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- References:
- 192.168 - why?
- From: Antonio Macchi
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: KR
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: Antonio Macchi
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: KR
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: Antonio Macchi
- 192.168 - why?
- Prev by Date: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Next by Date: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Previous by thread: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Next by thread: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Index(es):