Re: 192.168 - why?

From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:09:57 +0000 (UTC)

How about getting everyone onto IPv6 and then not need to use these
silly private ranges :) And so not worry about VPN conflicts and
whatnot and worry about something else instead.

rick jones
--
The computing industry isn't as much a game of "Follow The Leader" as
it is one of "Ring Around the Rosy" or perhaps "Duck Duck Goose."
- Rick Jones
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 192.168 - why?
  - From: Cork Soaker

References:
- 192.168 - why?
  - From: Antonio Macchi
- Re: 192.168 - why?
  - From: Bit Twister

Prev by Date: Duplicate pings
Next by Date: Re: 192.168 - why?
Previous by thread: Re: 192.168 - why?
Next by thread: Re: 192.168 - why?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: 192.168 - why?
... Rick Jones wrote: ... silly private ranges:) And so not worry about VPN conflicts and ... whatnot and worry about something else instead. ...
(comp.os.linux.networking)
Re: More Ares problems
... an SPS plus a rectenna farm? ... It _could_ be decades - all that worry about the dangerous death rays ... - Rick Jones ...
(sci.space.history)