Re: 192.168 - why?

In article <4889ff2a$0$40309$4fafbaef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
antonio_macchi@xxxxxxxx (Antonio Macchi) writes:

why does *everybody* use 192.168.0.1, and not simpler 10.0.0.1?

"65,000 IP addresses ought to be enough for anybody."

--
/~\ cgibbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Charlie Gibbs)
\ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855.
/ \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!

.