Re: 192.168 - why?

Antonio Macchi <antonio_macchi@xxxxxxxx> writes:

why does *everybody* use 192.168.0.1, and not simpler 10.0.0.1?

imho, 192.168 and 172.16 is unuseful, and unnecessarily complicated


10.x.x.x = 16000000 hosts/networks

192.168.x.x = only 60000 hosts/nets

16000000 is not enough?

60000 isn't enought for an individual/small business?

And if you need more than 60K addresses, you better understand IP addressing.

.