Re: 192.168 - why?
bgeer wrote:
Antonio Macchi <antonio_macchi@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> why does *everybody* use 192.168.0.1, and not simpler 10.0.0.1?
>>
>> They don't.
>>
>not true... every examples in books use 192.168
>the defaults of my router is 192.168
>honestly... they do
How many hosts do you need on your network?
Why do you think 10.0.0.1 is simpler - because there are less digits?
Just curious...
He thinks it's binary and therefore FASTER. LoL.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Route tables
... > gateway does do NAT. ... ethernet card's configuration (which is usually why the lo interface ... One end plugs into their router, ... -- all hosts configured to use same network ...
(comp.os.linux.networking) - Re: Where to find a COMPLETE VBScript reference?
... > Pocket reference book and other books, one which is called "The ULTIMATE ... Since VBS can operate under a number of different hosts and is designed to ... Scripting facilitates other operations. ...
(microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript) - Re: hosts Eintraege werden nicht erkannt
... nur in der hosts Datei stehen (Internet üb. ... LAN->DSL Router ok, DNS IP ist ... Windows-IP-Konfiguration zu den and. ... Ethernetadapter LAN-Verbindung: ...
(microsoft.public.de.german.windowsxp.networking) - Re: Terrible Web Surfing Speed
... Are you doing NAT at the router or do you have static ... >> random IPs to your internal hosts? ... > And I understand the DNS server addresses can be passed from the ... > I will have to investigate if there is a way for Linux hosts to share ...
(comp.os.linux.networking) - Re: Help with simple routing
... You need to enter an explicit routing entry ... > only if you want to reach hosts which are not part of the ... > 192.168.2.0/24 net from your Linux router. ... >>ping between them, not to any of the other machines on the network and I ...
(comp.os.linux.networking) |
|
