Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Grant <g_r_a_n_t_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:33:40 +1000
Pardon me for breaking in late,
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:59:04 -0700, "D. Stussy" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Ravenpi" <ken@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13e6eb39-7467-40af-8b01-884e9e1eb838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
WOW. Thanks, guys. You've given me lots to chew on. As for not
being able to throttle in-bound connections,
Both rsync and wget offer working rate-limiting in userspace, why is it
then that people are still saying inbound throttling cannot be done when
there are these working examples of it?
Thanks,
Grant.
--
http://bugsplatter.id.au/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Andy Furniss
- Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Rick Jones
- Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- References:
- Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Ravenpi
- Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Felix Tiede
- Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Ravenpi
- Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: D. Stussy
- Rate limiting with "tc"?
- Prev by Date: Re: Recommendation for 1000BASE-T NIC
- Next by Date: Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- Next by thread: Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- Index(es):