Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Andy Furniss <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:28:35 +0100
Grant wrote:
Pardon me for breaking in late,
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:59:04 -0700, "D. Stussy" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Ravenpi" <ken@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13e6eb39-7467-40af-8b01-884e9e1eb838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
WOW. Thanks, guys. You've given me lots to chew on. As for not
being able to throttle in-bound connections,
Both rsync and wget offer working rate-limiting in userspace, why is it then that people are still saying inbound throttling cannot be done when there are these working examples of it?
Thanks,
Grant.
I think it would be better to say you can't do it perfectly.
You can still do a lot better than doing nothing for inbound.
As the OP has plenty of bandwidth then shaping or policing each user to 50% should work well.
Andy.
.
- References:
- Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Ravenpi
- Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Felix Tiede
- Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Ravenpi
- Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: D. Stussy
- Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- From: Grant
- Rate limiting with "tc"?
- Prev by Date: Re: IPsec wifi link in ad-hoc mode
- Next by Date: Is there an Anti-Virus Proxy like system?
- Previous by thread: Re: Rate limiting with "tc"?
- Next by thread: LTSP Thin Client Configuration
- Index(es):