Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces

On Oct 29, 5:54 pm, Rick Jones <rick.jon...@xxxxxx> wrote:

While "Linux" is very much not such a stack on a "Strong End-System
Model" system binding to a given IP address is pretty much the same
thing since the traffic to that IP will only be accepted on that
interface.

Umm, no!!! That would make building a router virtually impossible.

Traffic to any IP assigned to the machine will, and must, be accepted
regardless of what interface it arrives on.

DS
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
    ... David Schwartz wrote: ... Model" system binding to a given IP address is pretty much the same ... regardless of what interface it arrives on. ... Some systems (eg HP-UX, perhaps Solaris) allow ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
    ... David Schwartz writes: ... Model" system binding to a given IP address is pretty much the same ... regardless of what interface it arrives on. ... Sounds like a real security risk to me. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Motorola Razr V3C
    ... that they intend to incorporate on all future phones regardless of the brand (and it's rumored that there might even be a future software update that will impose the same interface on the e815). ... The idea is that regardless of the phone brand or model, the interface will be standardized and tech support won't have to reference different manuals and explain differing procedures to access a feature from one phone to the next. ... Of course, the drawbacks are that there is no differnetiation between phone models when it comes to the user interface, and if you don't like the interface, then the only recourse is to go to a different carrier. ...
    (alt.cellular.verizon)
  • Making a generic data layer
    ... I would like to make a generic set of methods that could be called regardless ... of course I can't instantiate an interface. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.adonet)
  • Making a generic Parameter class
    ... I would like to make a generic set of methods that could be called regardless ... of course I can't instantiate an interface. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)