Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:57:45 +0000 (UTC)
David Schwartz <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 29, 5:54?pm, Rick Jones <rick.jon...@xxxxxx> wrote:
While "Linux" is very much not such a stack on a "Strong End-System
Model" system binding to a given IP address is pretty much the same
thing since the traffic to that IP will only be accepted on that
interface.
Umm, no!!! That would make building a router virtually impossible.
Indeed, it wouldn't take to routing changes very well, but it could
still route. However, given the term has "end system" in it, that
would (IIRC) be out of the context of something acting as an IP
router.
Traffic to any IP assigned to the machine will, and must, be accepted
regardless of what interface it arrives on.
In the weak end system model, yes. In the strong end system model
that does not apply. Some systems (eg HP-UX, perhaps Solaris) allow
the system to be put into (some variation on the theme of) the strong
end system model.
rick jones
--
oxymoron n, Hummer H2 with California Save Our Coasts and Oceans plates
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- References:
- restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- From: Wolfgang Draxinger
- Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- From: Rick Jones
- Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- From: David Schwartz
- restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- Prev by Date: Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- Next by Date: Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- Previous by thread: Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- Next by thread: Re: restrict implicit binding to interfaces
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|