Re: load-balancing twin 10GbE?

david wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:17:50 -0700, Steve Wampler rearranged some
electrons to say:

The 960MB is too close to 10Gb for me the believe we can
get by with one port - hence the interest in bonding.


It is? 960MB is 9.6% of 10GB.


True, but it's 96% of 10Gb.

--
Steve Wampler -- swampler@xxxxxxxx
The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: load-balancing twin 10GbE?
    ... Steve Wampler wrote: ... electrons to say: ... get by with one port - hence the interest in bonding. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • RE: port bonding and taps
    ... I am using channel bonding with RH 9 and it works great ... alias bond0 bonding ... Red Hat 8and sure of 9 has channel bonding already setup. ... Subject: port bonding and taps ...
    (Focus-IDS)
  • Ralph Griswold
    ... Ralph passed away yesterday morning at age 72. ... Steve Wampler -- swampler@xxxxxxxx ... The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud. ...
    (comp.lang.icon)
  • Re: Java 1.4.2, I need a set of unique strings
    ... Then iterate throught the keys when you are done reading the file. ... Steve Wampler -- swampler@xxxxxxxx ... The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: priority queue
    ... Maybe someday I'll mature enough to read all the way through a thread ... before commenting! ... Steve Wampler -- swampler@xxxxxxxx ... The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)