Re: Joining subnets
- From: David Schwartz <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 24, 5:39 am, billbo <bpl...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The servers subnet and the lan subnet are not physically connected.
The linux nat firewall is being used to connect them only at specified
ports and ip addresses like a bridge. Each lan client is then routed
to this bridge to access services on the server subnet. By using
nat, I do not have to worry about routing to the lan network from the
servers. The nat fw also seems to offer better isolation as the lan
network is being treated as an untrusted network.
Well then the answer to your question is obvious -- the more elegant
solution than using NAT is not using NAT. The NAT serves almost no
purpose, so just get rid of it.
DS
.
- References:
- Joining subnets
- From: billbo
- Re: Joining subnets
- From: Moe Trin
- Re: Joining subnets
- From: billbo
- Joining subnets
- Prev by Date: Re: Joining subnets
- Next by Date: Re: Joining subnets
- Previous by thread: Re: Joining subnets
- Next by thread: Re: Joining subnets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|