Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- From: David Schwartz <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 16, 5:37 am, David Schwartz <dav...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What is your original problem? All you did was state a proposed
solution and asked how to implement it. You never stated a problem.
Why do you want to tie a UDP reply to an incoming interface, rather
than sending it on the best interface to reach its destination? If you
do want to send it on the best interface to reach its destination, why
isn't your routing table doing that?
Ahh, I see from your other post clarifying. You need source address
based routing. See my other reply.
DS
.
- References:
- Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- From: pk
- Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- From: pk
- Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- From: pk
- Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- From: pk
- Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- From: David Schwartz
- Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- Prev by Date: Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- Next by Date: Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- Previous by thread: Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- Next by thread: Re: Tie UDP reply to incoming interface
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|