Re: Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- From: David Schwartz <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 04:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 28, 4:20 am, Roger Blake <rogbl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2010-08-27, Xavier Roche <xro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, just tested and NATing is not available at all - probably because
NAT on v6 is really stupid (and nobody wants NAT to live forever)
Why not? Why would anyone not running a public server want their
network interface exposed directly to the internet?
NAT and firewalls have nothing to do with each other. NAT happens to
provide some slight level of security by accident that you can't rely
on.
DS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- From: David Brown
- Re: Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- References:
- Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- From: Xavier Roche
- Re: Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- From: Pascal Hambourg
- Re: Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- From: Xavier Roche
- Re: Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- From: Roger Blake
- Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- Next by Date: Re: Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- Next by thread: Re: Is source address selection based on rules (netfilter) possible ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|