Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC?
- From: Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Sep 2011 08:52:07 GMT
On Sat, 2011-09-10, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
I wonder, is there a lightweight DNS server to be used as a
???slave???? The zones to be served are DNSSEC-signed, so it should
check the signature on AXFR/IXFR and only accept the new data if
it's valid. (It isn't much an issue to prepare a list of
trusted keys for it, but DLV support will nevertheless be
handy.)
Will Maradns or PowerDNS fit?
Or is BIND 9.7 really the best possible solution for this task?
Is there any specific reason why you think bind won't do? Or do you
simply think it's overkill because it has lots of features which you
don't need?
/Jorgen
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC?
- From: Ivan Shmakov
- Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC?
- References:
- lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC?
- From: Ivan Shmakov
- lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC?
- Prev by Date: NIS client will not work through firewall, help please
- Next by Date: Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC?
- Previous by thread: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC?
- Next by thread: Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|