Re: Cell Processor performance - upto 100x Intel Xeon in certain operations
From: Klaus Fehrle (FirstnameLastname_at_t-online.de)
Date: 06/14/05
- Previous message: ppesci_at_gmail.com: "Re: Mac, Intel, and LinuxPPC"
- In reply to: Maynard Handley: "Re: Cell Processor performance - upto 100x Intel Xeon in certain operations"
- Next in thread: Yousuf Khan: "Re: Cell Processor performance - upto 100x Intel Xeon in certain operations"
- Reply: Yousuf Khan: "Re: Cell Processor performance - upto 100x Intel Xeon in certain operations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 01:27:28 +0200
Maynard Handley wrote:
> In article <krmdnRsF8vsaIjDfRVn-gA@comcast.com>, <Rage6c> wrote:
>
> NEWSFLASH: Chip optimized for task X performs better at task X than chip
> optimized for task Y.
>
> Idiot.
>
While your _Newsflash_-statement stands undisputed, there is no need to
go ad hominem. At least not as long TOP500 is published on a
Linpack-score. :-)
KF
- Previous message: ppesci_at_gmail.com: "Re: Mac, Intel, and LinuxPPC"
- In reply to: Maynard Handley: "Re: Cell Processor performance - upto 100x Intel Xeon in certain operations"
- Next in thread: Yousuf Khan: "Re: Cell Processor performance - upto 100x Intel Xeon in certain operations"
- Reply: Yousuf Khan: "Re: Cell Processor performance - upto 100x Intel Xeon in certain operations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]