Re: My experiences trying to leverage the power of Linux in the enterprise

From: John Bailo (jabailo_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 12/09/03 

Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:47:33 GMT

Kadaitcha Man wrote:

> Oh, and you neglected to mention that ASP.NET creates native executables.
>
> HAND
>
>

"Native" executables? Are you saying that you don't need the .NET
framework to run the dll that is created when compiling the codebehind
web applcation?

Are you?

Cause if you are..then you're dumas mofo.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Framework version issues
    ... Then as you compiled the dll, ... was compiled with the v1.1 of the Framework. ... would be the case with compiling with either 2002 or 2003 versions of VS.NET ... If you don't have a test server, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: My experiences trying to leverage the power of Linux in the enterprise
    ... Are you saying that you don't need the .NET ... framework to run the dll that is created when compiling the codebehind ...
    (alt.os.linux)
  • Re: My experiences trying to leverage the power of Linux in the enterprise
    ... Are you saying that you don't need the .NET ... framework to run the dll that is created when compiling the codebehind ...
    (comp.os.linux)
  • Re: What is Needed to Get an ASP.NET Page to Work?
    ... MyProject.dll, basically everything in the bin folder after compiling, ... Besides the entire bin folder, and any aspx pages, it should work fine. ... Also, everytime you compile an asp.net 2.0 website, a number of dll ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Plugins in C#
    ... library by compiling it into the dll. ... plug in DLL, when in reality, you didn't need to do anything like that. ... What is the reason for not distributing one assembly with the interface ... It's almost the same as the old project, however the TypeLib was ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)