Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations
From: Davorin Vlahovic (A-Burn_at_fly.srk.fer.hr)
Date: 12/28/03
- Next message: General Schvantzkoph: "Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Previous message: David: "Re: Alternative to GNU's 'su' ?"
- In reply to: Jason Hong: "good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Next in thread: General Schvantzkoph: "Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 12:58:29 +0100
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.os.linux.]
On 2003-12-28, Jason Hong <dukeobee@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> My customer wants to deploy Sun sparc station to Linux box as utility
> servers like automount, samba, dns and mail.
>
> They have the following hardware.
>
> Sun UltraSparc 1 170MHz
> Sun UltraSparc 1 140MHz
> Sun UltraSparc 10 400MHz
> Sun Blade100 500MHz
>
> What will be the best Linux distribution for them? I looket at
> http://www.ultralinux.org, but I am not sure which one is the most reliable?
IIRC, you've got debian :)
-- I've found a great way to fight spammers....if you want to find out how, mail me at postmaster@localhost ... very very soon, there'll be a reply.
- Next message: General Schvantzkoph: "Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Previous message: David: "Re: Alternative to GNU's 'su' ?"
- In reply to: Jason Hong: "good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Next in thread: General Schvantzkoph: "Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
