Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations
From: General Schvantzkoph (schvantzkoph_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/28/03
- Next message: Fred Emmott: "Re: USB Camera problems in Slackware 9.0, kernel 2.4.23"
- Previous message: Davorin Vlahovic: "Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- In reply to: Jason Hong: "good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Next in thread: Erik de Castro Lopo: "Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Reply: Erik de Castro Lopo: "Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 10:27:39 -0500
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 08:32:38 +0000, Jason Hong wrote:
> My customer wants to deploy Sun sparc station to Linux box as utility
> servers like automount, samba, dns and mail.
>
> They have the following hardware.
>
> Sun UltraSparc 1 170MHz
> Sun UltraSparc 1 140MHz
> Sun UltraSparc 10 400MHz
> Sun Blade100 500MHz
>
> What will be the best Linux distribution for them? I looket at
> http://www.ultralinux.org, but I am not sure which one is the most reliable?
>
> Thank you,
> J
The UltraSparc 1s should be deployed as doorstops. The SunBlade100 is
still useful but you might as well keep Solaris on it, which switch it to
Linux?
- Next message: Fred Emmott: "Re: USB Camera problems in Slackware 9.0, kernel 2.4.23"
- Previous message: Davorin Vlahovic: "Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- In reply to: Jason Hong: "good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Next in thread: Erik de Castro Lopo: "Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Reply: Erik de Castro Lopo: "Re: good Linux candidate for Sun sparc workstations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
