Re: Linux vs. CD & DVD
From: D.R (D.R_at_nospam.nospam)
Date: 01/24/04
- Previous message: David: "searching the net"
- In reply to: daeron: "Re: Linux vs. CD & DVD"
- Next in thread: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Linux vs. CD & DVD"
- Reply: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Linux vs. CD & DVD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:53:46 +1300
"daeron" <daeron@some.net> wrote in message
news:4008f6e3$0$4051$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Ben Measures wrote:
> > Does it really matter if GUI front-ends pass all
> > the hard work to cdrecord?
>
> Does it matter that programs like K3b fracture the KDE
> community into various rival platform specific sub-groups
> instead of remaining a cohesive community?
>
> ========
> > Cdrecord is an excellent piece
> Not as flexible or effient as burncd.
> - well, compile it on Linux & prove me wrong, because in the
> Posix world effectively 100% of people prefer to use burncd
> rather than cdrecord when they have that choice.
>
> > of software that is being well maintained.
> Is it? How many long before it aknowledged that 99.9% of all
> CD-burners are IDE devices, or how long before it was/is able
> to handle DVD, years? But the question is why keep spending
> resources upon a legacy Linux SCSI software when working POSIX
> source for a cleaner solution is avialble?
>
Doesn't Kernel 2.6 fix the SCSI emulation hack?
- Previous message: David: "searching the net"
- In reply to: daeron: "Re: Linux vs. CD & DVD"
- Next in thread: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Linux vs. CD & DVD"
- Reply: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Linux vs. CD & DVD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
