Re: Why and How to move from Win to Linux?

From: Mattias Honrendgard (comeand_at_kissmyfatarse.com)
Date: 06/08/04

  • Next message: Peter Saffrey: "Re: pppd starts, but no connection"
    Date: 8 Jun 2004 04:25:37 -0700
    
    

    Jack McGovern <jack@kwjhdwedjw.invalid> wrote in message news:<fhm8c01bpa8mcm7ivkpgpg204ubg2k887t@4ax.com>...
    > Sorry, this has probably been answered earlier, but googling left me
    > with such a vast number of hits that I sort of "collapsed"...
    >
    > I'm a middle manager of a company with approx 200 employees all using
    > Windows 2000 or XP with typical office applications like MS Office but
    > at the same time more uncommon software for project management, hr
    > management etc. All servers run Windows NT / 2000 server (I think...)

    There are lots of alternatives.
     
    > I'm not an IT guy, but a few of my subordinates has told me that I
    > should bring on to the top management that maybe we should move to
    > Linux for both servers and workstations.

    Its a good idea. You get a virus-free, stable, easily manageable
    environment that isn't tied up with constrictive licensing issues. Oh,
    you save a lot on that cap-ex budget too! 200 x WinXP + 200 x Office
    Professional 2003 + Lots of Client Access Liceses + Microsoft Exchange
    and you're getting into $100,000+ of spend. But of course, you don't
    have to just chuck everything out. There is no problem running *both*
    Linux and Microsoft Windows.

    > I admit that we are experiencing a few stability problems with the
    > current platform, and they have told me that it would drastically
    > improve if we change to Linux. Is that really true? Where can I find
    > documentation of this?

    Yes, its really true. Ask an ISP about the average uptime of a Linux /
    UNIX system compared to a Windows system. Eg:

    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/isp.avg.html
     
    > The move itself; for the server's part I guess it won't be a big
    > problem (will it? can somehow all data on the servers just be
    > "incorporated" in the new Linux installation? Mail, user's documents,
    > etc.) but how about the workstations? How would we execute a move from
    > Windows to Linux on 200+ workstations without creating several days of
    > downtime while installing Linux OS and Linux software and converting
    > user files (not just documents etc but user accounts etc.) ?

    Depends on the specifics. Downtime can be avoided by running systems
    in parallel, migrating small components at a time. Obviously it is
    good to have a test environment. I'd set up a lab to get some use
    cases as well so you know what to expect before it happens. Build your
    own distro (very simple, and no problem with licenses!) and you can
    either deploy via CD or network install.
     
    > And finally, will all employees have to be trained in using Linux
    > before they can use it, or will most of them recognize the user
    > interface from Windows and thus keep doing the basic stuff and get
    > trained for the more advanced tasks later?

    Fortunately the Linux environment can be highly customised. KDE can be
    made to act very much like Microsoft Windows (double-click to activate
    an icon, little X in the top-right of a window). Keybindings can be
    made the same (alt-f4 to close an application, etc). It really depends
    on exactly what your desktop users are doing, but as long as they are
    happy with moving a mouse that controls a pointer on the monitor that
    interacts with pictorial representations of functions, they'll be
    fine.
     
    > I hope someone could help me out a bit here...

    There are loads of helpful people :)

    > Thanks,
    > Jack

    No problems


  • Next message: Peter Saffrey: "Re: pppd starts, but no connection"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: What Linux flavor is best for office use?
      ... You are much better off purchasing laptops that will run linux rather than ... Windows is not that easy to teach your employees. ... Your employees arrived at your company with MS Windows skills, ... For example do your employees need the KDE toys, games, edutainment in the ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: 11,000 new viruses targeting Microsoft Windows
      ... >>> labelled incompetent because they chose Windows, ... >>He empowered his employees to choose as they will for their own reasons. ... And if Joe ... If you understood management, you'd understand Joe has empowered his ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Linux Just isnt ready for the desktop. Get used to hearing it or go and improve it.
      ... nor does Linux work very well for many people and companies. ... > compared to the Windows they are using now. ... with US $ with American companies like Microsoft? ... > employees workstations and laptops for mobile employees. ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: Linux Just isnt ready for the desktop. Get used to hearing it or go and improve it.
      ... nor does Linux work very well for many people and companies. ... > compared to the Windows they are using now. ... with US $ with American companies like Microsoft? ... > employees workstations and laptops for mobile employees. ...
      (alt.os.linux.redhat)
    • Why Linux was a failure at my company.
      ... Microsoft and other Windows software consisting mostly of Microsoft ... We had been hearing a lot about Linux and several of the staff ... Initially we had Openoffice for Windows slipstreamed onto our ... employees workstations and laptops for mobile employees. ...
      (alt.os.linux)

    Loading