Re: Fedora Documentation

From: A Nengineer (awful_at_tragedy.com)
Date: 01/03/05


Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 21:08:54 GMT

Ivan Marsh wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:06:02 +0000, A Nengineer wrote:
>
>
>>Fedora Core is a whole different animal. It is perfect for someone like
>>me, running one itty-bitty server machine in my SOHO "enterprise."
>
>
> It works quite well for those of us running mission critial servers in a
> production environment also.
>
I don't doubt it. However, the INTENT of Fedora Core is to be "bleeding
edge," which enterprises that run machines of that description typically
don't want to do.

That's why RHEL exists.

Nice to have a choice, though. For me, the amount of time potentially
spent in setting up and operating the server is worth it not to have to
actually buy any software!



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Fedora Documentation
    ... Ivan Marsh wrote: ... > It works quite well for those of us running mission critial servers in a ... the INTENT of Fedora Core is to be "bleeding ...
    (linux.redhat.misc)
  • Re: Fedora Documentation
    ... Ivan Marsh wrote: ... > It works quite well for those of us running mission critial servers in a ... the INTENT of Fedora Core is to be "bleeding ...
    (linux.redhat.install)
  • Re: Fedora Documentation
    ... Ivan Marsh wrote: ... > It works quite well for those of us running mission critial servers in a ... the INTENT of Fedora Core is to be "bleeding ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: FS: Redhat Professional Worstation (RedHat Enterprise Linux)
    ... Ivan Marsh wrote: ... > It's not legal to transfer software licenses. ... Fedora Core 3 ... gordonATgbpcomputingDOTcoDOTuk ...
    (linux.redhat.misc)