Re: Red Hat Linux 5.0 Installation problem.

From: Moe Trin (ibuprofin_at_painkiller.example.tld)
Date: 01/08/05

  • Next message: The Dread: "Re: SuSE 9.2 Pro DVD frustrations"
    Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:25:25 -0600
    
    

    In article <qzeDd.50529$P%3.1877657@news20.bellglobal.com>, David Lonsdale
    wrote:

    >I tried installing the Red Hat Linux 5.0 onto the old 486 PC with 48MB RAM
    >and 500MB HD.

    I realize that not that many modern distributions will operate on something
    that old and small, but 5.0 was a real dog. It was the version Red Hat used
    to introduce the glibc2 libraries, and there were a LOT of problems with it.
    RH5.0 came out seven years ago, and was only supported until April 1999.
    RH 5.2 would be a better version if you need such an old distribution (but
    it's also been unsupported since October 2001). Something modern like Debian
    or Slackware will fit, and are supported.

    > After selecting the packages, the installation program
    >proceeded to set up the exf2 filesystem. But, in the middle of copying the
    >programs from the CD to the hard drive, (where 48MB has been reserved for
    >Linux Swap space

    That's quite a lot of swap for a distribution that old. Our 5.2 installs
    tended to only need 16 Megs with that much RAM - and I don't think we used
    swap on systems with 64 Megs of RAM.

    > and the rest for the Linux Native space), the installation
    >program froze and display an error message in the middle of screen:
    >
    >Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:05

    You are telling the system you want to use partition 5 on the first SCSI
    drive (/dev/sda5). If this is correct, are you using the correct kernel
    parameters and SCSI controller? Does the partition exist? If I interpret
    you correctly, you say you only have two partitions, and partition 5 has
    to be a logical one (contained with an extended partition - probably 2, 3,
    or 4).

    >Does anybody know what this means? Is there a way I can fix it?

    Have you looked for suggestions in the installation guide? We only looked
    at 5.0 (and 5.1 - we stayed with 4.2 until 1999 when we jumped to 5.2),
    and that was _years_ ago - but as I recall there was a decent book that
    came with the real Red Hat, and an electronic version of the book was
    also included on the first CD. If you are using a GPL version, I can't
    say because there were so many different versions, some of which only
    included the binarys and IDE install program on a single CD.

            Old guy


  • Next message: The Dread: "Re: SuSE 9.2 Pro DVD frustrations"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Good reasons4 NOT choosing freebsd
      ... This should be handled by the controller ... can reside inside "huge files" within an NTFS/FAT32 partition. ... Windows or anything else. ... a distribution that requires Windows in order to ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: Mandrake 10 vs. Suse 9.1
      ... then create an extended partition (no need to format it and use linux to ... the same group names as suse i.e. ... In Mandrake the same file would be owned by anc and group anc. ... customisation that other vendors have put into their distribution though. ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linuxs GPLv2 and GPLv3?
      ... partition to use it as swap on first boot, ... You also cannot interpret the encrypted partition as source code because ... You could argue that they do not restrict copying, distribution ... restricted because of the encryption which prevents the user to copy, ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Can two distributions share the same /home partition?
      ... I am planing to install on my new hd Suse AND Kubuntu Linux. ... planing to make BOTH distribution share the same /home partition (I ... will make a separate partition for /home and of course both they will ... If you just need to access files from the other distros home, ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: Mergemaster enhancement
      ... automagically upgrade files that have changed in the /usr/src/etc distribution but the user hasn't changed. ... Through clever use of mtree, I build an mtree description of everything that make distribution installs from the temproot. ...
      (freebsd-arch)