Re: dhcpd with 2 interfaces
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia (nkadel_at_comcast.net)
Date: 10/21/03
- Next message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Copy an NTFS partition"
- Previous message: Robert Bamler: "Re: New Kernel - VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 304 or unknown-block(3,4)"
- In reply to: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: dhcpd with 2 interfaces"
- Next in thread: P.T. Breuer: "Re: dhcpd with 2 interfaces"
- Reply: P.T. Breuer: "Re: dhcpd with 2 interfaces"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:47:20 -0400
Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> randome_profile@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>geeze, I wasn't totally clear but I assumed everyone here has experience
>>with this kind of setup.
>
>
> WHAT kind of setup?
>
>
>
>>I have a DSL connection to the internet,
>
>
> So do I. The DSL router is a dhcp server. It has to be, since in
> principle it will require a dhcp contact before it will pass packets
> to/from that MAC, since it's not silly :-) (it's a built-in firewalling
> facility).
Sigh. New news client, gotta re-install my Peter Breuer filters.
In any case, while most "cable routers/firewalls" are DHCP servers,
there is absolutely no requirement that they be. As long as the firewall
clients have their network configuration set up appropriately with an IP
in the correct network range, netwask, and the gateway set up to point
to the "router", it works just fine.
This information is *usually* published to the clients by DHCP on the
router, but it need not be.
- Next message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Copy an NTFS partition"
- Previous message: Robert Bamler: "Re: New Kernel - VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 304 or unknown-block(3,4)"
- In reply to: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: dhcpd with 2 interfaces"
- Next in thread: P.T. Breuer: "Re: dhcpd with 2 interfaces"
- Reply: P.T. Breuer: "Re: dhcpd with 2 interfaces"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|