Re: Help installing Fedora
From: P.T. Breuer (ptb_at_oboe.it.uc3m.es)
Date: 01/13/04
- Next message: Quadstone Ltd: "Problems installing SuSE 9.0 on Dell PowerEdge 6300"
- Previous message: John-Paul Stewart: "Re: P100, no CD-ROM, 8 megs of memory Linus install please"
- In reply to: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Help installing Fedora"
- Next in thread: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Help installing Fedora"
- Reply: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Help installing Fedora"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:10:25 GMT
Richard Steven Hack <richardhack@prontomail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:40:18 GMT, ptb@oboe.it.uc3m.es (P.T. Breuer)
> wrote:
> > Nobody
> >shows any documentation saying you can or can't, except me, who points
> >to two documents, one of which (kernel doc) says that a cdrom should be
> >always slave to an ide in order to be safe
> Slave to a hard drive, yes, but to another optical?
I already pointed once to the paragraph in my (first? second?) post
which stated what I was saying. The gist of the claim was that cdroms
don't (or didn't) come with electronics to be master to a "full" ide
device. Choose your value of "full" appropriately.
> >, and another of which (atapi
> >howto) says that if alone on a bus a cdrom must be jumpered as master.
> And none of your docs explain why.
I know why in that case. The kernel ide or cdrom driver code (I forget
which) never used to even look for a slave if a master was not present.
> I just read a PC Guide article that says while it is correct to jumper
> a CDROM alone on a bus as master, some CDROMS will work as solo slaves
> and others won't.
> The PC Guide site has a lot of stuff on master-slave and IDE/ATAPI
> configuration issues, but there isn't a lot relative to how
> CDRW/CDRs/DVDs necesssarily need to relate to each other. It's mostly
> about keeping hard drives master and opticals slaves, which is fairly
A hard drive is a "full" ide device by most peoples yardstick.
> obvious, although there are a variety of considerations there, too.
> >Nobody tells me what their idea of working is, such as being able to
> >run both at the same time without dropouts at their specified rate,
> Well, if you're copying CDs to CDRW, obviously that would be an issue
> - if in fact it became an issue. If it doesn't, then it's not a
> problem. One fellow I just quoted in an update to my previous post
> says he's been doing this since his old 233MHz no-burnproof setup with
> no problems. So is it a problem? Not for him, apparently. Maybe it
> used to be a problem, maybe it's a problem with some makes and models
> depending on the drive electronics, maybe there's no hard and fast
> rule or even a statistical norm if nobody's establishing the stats.
> >My mind is perfectly open!
> Empty is not the same as open - although it can be if it's the "right"
> kind of empty...:-)
My mind is empty of prejudices.
> >(and it is documented as such in the atapi howto) that cdroms come from
> >the factory jumpered as slaves.
> Which is reasonable as before CDs became common, it was expected that
> you had one hard drive, and if you had a second, it should be on the
> secondary IDE channel as master for performance reasons, which leaves
> only a slave position for an optical drive. Since most opticals end
> up as slaves, the factories jumper them that way. What is surprising
> about that?
The surprising thing is that they didn't come jumpered as master, so
you could pop them straight on to the empty second ide bus.
> Now when you have four devices, things get complicated. The
> recommendations are to put the hard drives on one IDE channel - since
> apparently, nowadays the hardware can handle speed differences between
> devices better than it used to - and the opticals on the secondary IDE
> channel. Problem is, no one seems to be specific about which optical
> should go where. The only thing people seem to agree on is that as
> long as you're not experiencing problems or doing a lot of CD to CDRW
> copies such that you get problems, then it's not important.
> >I don't know. I suggest somebody who is interested LOOK IT UP.
> Not THAT is a good idea. And I tried, but I can't find anything
> fairly quickly other than the PC Guide site which does cover a lot of
> this but still doesn't seem to answer this specific question.
> I assume there is more technical data somewhere that I could find if I
> were to search for ATAPI specs specifically, but it's 4:45 AM and I'm
> going to bed. Have a nice night, Peter!
G'night and sl'p tight.
Peter
- Next message: Quadstone Ltd: "Problems installing SuSE 9.0 on Dell PowerEdge 6300"
- Previous message: John-Paul Stewart: "Re: P100, no CD-ROM, 8 megs of memory Linus install please"
- In reply to: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Help installing Fedora"
- Next in thread: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Help installing Fedora"
- Reply: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Help installing Fedora"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|