Re: SuSE under Boot Manager?, part II
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 01/16/04
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: SuSE under Boot Manager?, part II"
- In reply to: Klaus Staedtler: "Re: SuSE under Boot Manager?, part II"
- Next in thread: Trevor Hemsley: "Re: SuSE under Boot Manager?, part II"
- Reply: Trevor Hemsley: "Re: SuSE under Boot Manager?, part II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:13:48 -0500
In <PIfNb.126679$Tz1.38360@news.chello.at>, on 01/14/2004
at 06:17 PM, Klaus Staedtler <gibtsnet@gibstnet.net> said:
>Suse uses since long GRUB, it can boot Boot Manager too, and by
>default (if you don't take care) it is installed in the MBR.
Easy to override, and easy to undo. The one that I object[1] to is PQ
PM, which changes partition types with no notice.
>Suse uses since long GRUB, it can boot Boot Manager too, and by
>default (if you don't take care) it is installed in the MBR. I
>clearly prefer to have Boot Manager to boot GRUB
OTOH, BM can handle only 4 systems.
[1] Since I own a copy of GTU, I was able to put it back. I wasn't a
happy camper, but it was just a nuisance. It would have been far
worse for someone without a sector editor.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action. I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.
Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: SuSE under Boot Manager?, part II"
- In reply to: Klaus Staedtler: "Re: SuSE under Boot Manager?, part II"
- Next in thread: Trevor Hemsley: "Re: SuSE under Boot Manager?, part II"
- Reply: Trevor Hemsley: "Re: SuSE under Boot Manager?, part II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|