Re: Grub did not install on dual boot machine.

linuxquestion_at_yahoo.com
Date: 01/21/04


Date: 21 Jan 2004 06:59:18 -0800

Here's another little piece on info.

First keep in mind, both my machines are Dells, with a hidden
(no drive letter) first partition on the first drive with the MBR.

I heard yesterday from a visitor that dual boots with
XP, and XP Pro will give different results with grub.
In particular, there was a problem with XP Pro.

Does anyone have any experience with this?

My machine that works fine, runs XP.
The one that is giving me problems, runs XP Pro.

Has anyone else successfully dual booted, on a Dell,
XP Pro, and Redhat, with grub? Has anyone had problems?

Thanks



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Grub did not install on dual boot machine.
    ... First keep in mind, both my machines are Dells, with a hidden ... (no drive letter) ... and XP Pro will give different results with grub. ...
    (linux.redhat.install)
  • Re: Grub did not install on dual boot machine.
    ... First keep in mind, both my machines are Dells, with a hidden ... (no drive letter) ... and XP Pro will give different results with grub. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Grub did not install on dual boot machine.
    ... >First keep in mind, both my machines are Dells, with a hidden ... >(no drive letter) first partition on the first drive with the MBR. ... and XP Pro will give different results with grub. ...
    (comp.os.linux.setup)
  • Re: Grub did not install on dual boot machine.
    ... >First keep in mind, both my machines are Dells, with a hidden ... >(no drive letter) first partition on the first drive with the MBR. ... and XP Pro will give different results with grub. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Grub did not install on dual boot machine.
    ... >First keep in mind, both my machines are Dells, with a hidden ... >(no drive letter) first partition on the first drive with the MBR. ... and XP Pro will give different results with grub. ...
    (linux.redhat.install)