Re: Take 2: Advanced routing: multiple FIREWALLED IPs
From: Rudolf Potucek (potucek_at_acs1.acs.ucalgary.ca)
Date: 06/11/04
- Next message: Bart: "Running rpm as non-root"
- Previous message: -(iAn)-: "Re: RH9 Poor performance, stability"
- In reply to: Rudolf Potucek: "Re: Take 2: Advanced routing: multiple FIREWALLED IPs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:37:11 +0000 (UTC)
DUH ... the problem is with the 64.x.x.x rule in table tnn ... for some
reason I don not entirely understand that rule seems to imply to the
kernel that the 64.x.x.x network should be a LOCAL network directly
connected to the interface. Removing that entry leads to all non-local
traffic going to the default gateway for that interface as intended.
Sorry for the static
Rudolf
-- The 3 'R's of Microsoft - Retry, Reboot, Reinstall...
- Next message: Bart: "Running rpm as non-root"
- Previous message: -(iAn)-: "Re: RH9 Poor performance, stability"
- In reply to: Rudolf Potucek: "Re: Take 2: Advanced routing: multiple FIREWALLED IPs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|