Re: Best distro of Linux for lame hardware?
From: mjt (mjtobler_at_removethis_mail.ru)
Date: 11/26/04
- Previous message: Florian Reitmeir: "Re: USB wireless SMC 2662W CA and atmelwlandriver-3.4.1.0.tar.bz2 with patch-atmel_reset.gz"
- In reply to: thundercleets_at_ no_spam_here yahoo.com: "Best distro of Linux for lame hardware?"
- Next in thread: Matt van de Werken: "Re: Best distro of Linux for lame hardware?"
- Reply: Matt van de Werken: "Re: Best distro of Linux for lame hardware?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 20:42:45 -0600
thundercleets@ no_spam_here yahoo.com wrote:
> Is there a distro out there that will work at an acceptable speed in
> Xwindows on this kind of hardware?
>
> Pentium 166 mmx
> 96 MB RAM
> 6 GB drive
... almost any distro, as long as you use a
lightweight window manager (icewm) and
lightweight applications.
read this article: "The Ultimate (but Small) Linux Box!"
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6169
-- << http://michaeljtobler.homelinux.com/ >> After a number of decimal places, nobody gives a damn.
- Previous message: Florian Reitmeir: "Re: USB wireless SMC 2662W CA and atmelwlandriver-3.4.1.0.tar.bz2 with patch-atmel_reset.gz"
- In reply to: thundercleets_at_ no_spam_here yahoo.com: "Best distro of Linux for lame hardware?"
- Next in thread: Matt van de Werken: "Re: Best distro of Linux for lame hardware?"
- Reply: Matt van de Werken: "Re: Best distro of Linux for lame hardware?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|