Re: Question about Linux
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia (nkadel_at_comcast.net)
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 10:26:23 -0500
"Hamilcar Barca" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> In article <ividndBKsKY_w0LcRVn-tA@comcast.com> (Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:14:33
> -0500), Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> "Hamilcar Barca" <email@example.com> wrote in message
>>> This is true and always has been true, despite your protestations to the
>>> contrary. If this is not clear, why not read Microsoft's installation
>>> documentation? Windows 2000 requires, as did Windows NT4, a primary
>>> partition on the first hard drive.
>> Because I've done it. Twice. Without significant difficulty.
> Since Windows 2000 disallows this, what insignificant difficulties did you
> encounter in fooling it?
As I remember, only having to reset the MBR with my Linux rescue CD to
reboot the Linux I had on the first drive. Setting MBR's is a bit of an