Re: RedHat - SuSE recomendation

From: Nico Kadel-Garcia (nkadel_at_comcast.net)
Date: 01/20/05 

Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:29:02 -0500

"mjt" <mjtobler@removethis_mail.ru> wrote in message
news:356lfeF4g8tq1U4@individual.net...
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> I use Fedora Core 2
>
>
> ... that's NOT for the enterprise

True. FC is for bleeding edge work.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Red Hat Kernel explaination
    ... Red hat AS..how we differentiate Red hat enterprise linux from fedora core ... distributions....the installer for this is anaconda..we wud have thought ... The .EL means it's the enterprise kernel. ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: FC2 to next Enterprise
    ... > be able to cleanly upgrade over Fedora Core 2? ... Enterprise upgrades will only be supported on previous ... money for Enterprise to get support... ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Linux FTP Clients
    ... Roy Schestowitz wrote: ... running on Fedora Core II. ... I haven't used KBear, ... Have a look at http://www.mbstevens.com/cgi/mkatt.pl?name=huh/Rube which contains some grumblings about the best FTP client. ...
    (alt.html)
  • Re: RedHat - SuSE recomendation
    ... > I find SuSE painful in the extreme. ... > running the same enterprise hardware in 4 years you're probably doing ... > cheap and use something based on a corporate enterprise server and not pay ... Roy Schestowitz ...
    (comp.os.linux.setup)
  • Re: Is anyone packaging spamassassin-3.1.0 for FC3?
    ... There are always current rpms for spamassassin for Fedora Core and Red ... Hat (Enterprise) Linux as far back as RHL 7.3 at ...
    (Fedora)