Re: individual firewalls considered useless (Re: Send local mail - how?)
From: John Hasler (john_at_dhh.gt.org)
Date: 01/25/05
- Previous message: kermit: "Re: Updating RHEL"
- In reply to: Charles Sullivan: "Re: individual firewalls considered useless (Re: Send local mail - how?)"
- Next in thread: Charles Sullivan: "Re: individual firewalls considered useless (Re: Send local mail - how?)"
- Reply: Charles Sullivan: "Re: individual firewalls considered useless (Re: Send local mail - how?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:43:23 -0600
Charles Sullivan writes:
> I have ping disabled also.
That doesn't make you invisible. If they don't get "destination
unreachable" they know you are there.
> Someone reading this newsgroup...
Nothing in a Usenet article reveals anything about your IP.
> ...or at a website I've visited would know there's a computer using my
> (dynamic) IP. But how would anyone know whether there is still a live
> connection?
They don't know or care what sites you visited. They just scan IP blocks.
-- John Hasler john@dhh.gt.org Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA
- Previous message: kermit: "Re: Updating RHEL"
- In reply to: Charles Sullivan: "Re: individual firewalls considered useless (Re: Send local mail - how?)"
- Next in thread: Charles Sullivan: "Re: individual firewalls considered useless (Re: Send local mail - how?)"
- Reply: Charles Sullivan: "Re: individual firewalls considered useless (Re: Send local mail - how?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|