Is reiserfs slower to mount / on bootup?
From: stu (stuartb_at_thelinuxlink.net)
Date: 10/30/05
- Next message: Martin Gerken: "Re: USB.Bluetooth not recognized at boot-time"
- Previous message: Enrique Perez-Terron: "Re: USB.Bluetooth not recognized at boot-time"
- Next in thread: mst: "Re: Is reiserfs slower to mount / on bootup?"
- Reply: mst: "Re: Is reiserfs slower to mount / on bootup?"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: Is reiserfs slower to mount / on bootup?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 11:06:04 -0500
I can't seem to find any info or benchmarks on this but I have 2
partitions on an external drive. One is ext2 and the other is reiserfs.
If I mount them I notice that the ext3 is mounted almost instantly and
the reiserfs takes 2.6 seconds even though it is much smaller. I have
SUSE 10 installed on a 100GB disk and during bootup there is a big lag
as / is mounted.
It seems that reiserfs has a bit of a hit to bootup times if you have a
large partition to mount as root.
Anybody else think this is the case?
I would not use a non-journaling fs like ext2, and I understand reiserfs
is a little better at fitting lots of small files into a fs but I don't
like the extra few seconds at bootup.
Thanks for any input
- Next message: Martin Gerken: "Re: USB.Bluetooth not recognized at boot-time"
- Previous message: Enrique Perez-Terron: "Re: USB.Bluetooth not recognized at boot-time"
- Next in thread: mst: "Re: Is reiserfs slower to mount / on bootup?"
- Reply: mst: "Re: Is reiserfs slower to mount / on bootup?"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: Is reiserfs slower to mount / on bootup?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|