Re: Distro advise
- From: Tim Buchanan <holdenman83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:10:18 +1200
Douglas Mayne wrote:
96MB is enough for Slackware. I don't know about X with the horsepower on
that CPU, though. XFCE is a minimalist window manager which might work.
This computer could function best as an "appliance" (fax machine, router,
dialin gateway, etc) or a file server like a file server where X is not
required.
Yes I was planning on using the box as a fileserver as I have several old hdd's that i have no room for in my main box. I wasn't planning on using X at all i prefer using the CLi most of the time.
Setup is complicated because of no CDROM, but there have been a couple ofCool, i will check these out.
recent threads which had some good ideas. I'll link here to what I wrote
(there are other entries on the threads also).
This is the simplest option (according to me) without the cdrom:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.linux.slackware/msg/7d128facee780cbe
This has the added complication of wanting to do a network install without
the cdrom:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.setup/msg/d069d997da74ac8a
This is an impressive recent online book which adds to the documentation
for slackware by Daniël de Kok:
http://www.slackbasics.org/html/slackware-basics.html
The official documentation is at the website:
http://www.slackware.com/
IMO, the linked book is more up to date.
Cheers for your help!
TTB
.
- References:
- Distro advise
- From: Tim Buchanan
- Re: Distro advise
- From: Douglas Mayne
- Re: Distro advise
- From: Tim Buchanan
- Re: Distro advise
- From: Douglas Mayne
- Distro advise
- Prev by Date: Re: Distro advise
- Next by Date: Re: Distro advise
- Previous by thread: Re: Distro advise
- Next by thread: Re: Distro advise
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|