Re: optimal partitions during install...
- From: left_coast <void@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:07:13 -0700
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
This is a religious war issue. Some folks like to have swap, /, /boot,
/usr, /usr/local, /var, /boot, /opt, /home, /pointless, /useless,
/always-too-small, and /always-forgotten all on the same system.
Me, I'm a big fan of swap and /, and don't mess with the partitioning:
with cheap backup and cheap huge disks it's a waste of time in most
systems. If you need a particular partition, for something like a news
spool that gets a lot of churn and needs to be fast, buy a fast disk or
RAID array for it and keep the OS separate.
It is not a religious war issue. There are valid technical reasons for
partitioning. With your swap and /, if you install a newer version and want
to do it "clean" you can not just format over / without losing the data.
Restoring from backup is more trouble that it is worth. By cutting
out /var, /usr/local/ and /home, a new install can format / but leave old
error messages, anything in /var/spool and any custom compiled software on
the system with no need to restore from backup after the new install. A
backup is still a very good idea before upgrade but I have never had to
restore user data after a clean install. If you have a news spool, the
spool is STILL THERE after the install. No need to recreate or restore from
backup.
--
NOTE: Name change. Was matt_left_coast.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: optimal partitions during install...
- From: John Hasler
- Re: optimal partitions during install...
- References:
- optimal partitions during install...
- From: cooch17
- Re: optimal partitions during install...
- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
- optimal partitions during install...
- Prev by Date: Re: optimal partitions during install...
- Next by Date: Re: optimal partitions during install...
- Previous by thread: Re: optimal partitions during install...
- Next by thread: Re: optimal partitions during install...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|