Re: need help with dependencies for apt-get


Did you get apt-*.rpm for the appropriate operating system?
Seriously, many of those are basic libraries indeed, and I'm guessing
that you have one from a wildly divergent operating system. What OS
are you working with?




Me or the OP? me personally am using 2.4.16 (upgrading gcc beyond 2.95
is a b*tch for me) upgraded from slackware 7.0. the OP is either using
redhat or debian, what kernel I have no idea. As for the versions, he
may just have an old distribution. I last got 2.2.16 in a distribution
and have about 2 gig of tar.gz's that I used to upgrade to where I am
now, so anything's possible in that respect.

P.S. My xnews shows you replying to me not the OP.

--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Upgrade vs Reinstall
    ... > If I'm not mistaken, the one major flaw in upgrading is that, while ... distribution, you miss out on anything / everything that is new to the ... Just an example why Installing would be better than an upgrade. ... option from FC3 to what will be FC4. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: need help with dependencies for apt-get
    ... he may just have an old distribution. ... But "2.4.16" is a kernel, ... but the packages that come in a distribution ... Especially if you haven't been upgrading packages all along, ...
    (comp.os.linux.setup)
  • Re: Why FC-2?
    ... On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 07:49, Timothy Murphy wrote: ... > I'm not entirely clear why it is necessary to have a new distribution. ... What's the point of upgrading from a steam engine to a gas ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: SUS/SMS, mssecure and hfnetchk.mof
    ... I just reviewed the update and now notice where MS states that it wont be picked up by MBSA. ... As far as upgrading, I didnt know there was a newer version of the SUS peature pack out there. ... > not be available for distribution through the Distribute Software Updates ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.tools)