Re: installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- From: slam7211@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 22 Jun 2006 20:39:08 -0700
ok i reformatted my partition
question 2
what are the system requierments for the latest Suse linux (including
hardware compatability issues)
chuckcar wrote:
Grant <bugsplatter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:te3k92hqvjjagf7om0flddk3oi9lk68f11@xxxxxxx:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:10:26 -0400, "Nico Kadel-Garcia"
<nkadel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You can't run Linux's basic OS on FAT32
You can, see Slackware ZipSlack.
Grant.
There's also a version of linux (name escapes me right now) that runs on
a FAT32 partition proper as opposed to zipslack which runs out of zip
files kind of like Stacker used to.
--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- From: chuckcar
- Re: installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- References:
- installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- From: slam7211
- Re: installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- From: Grant
- Re: installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- From: chuckcar
- installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- Prev by Date: Re: Wiping out MBR (and Grub)
- Next by Date: Re: Fedora / FreeBSD files question
- Previous by thread: Re: installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- Next by thread: Re: installing linux on an empty/unformatted (but already there) fat32 partition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
