Re: installation failed
- From: Michael Heiming <michael+USENET@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:53:30 +0200
In comp.os.linux.setup news.cogeco.ca <BushIsATraitor@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
"Michael Heiming" <michael+USENET@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:i94no3--
Why not just use something working?
That would require scrapping the entire Linux Operating system.
Why would a wintroll such as you care about a message in a linux
newsgroup that is over a month old?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Remaining conclusion, your are complete dense or paid to reply to
all those old threads?
Good riddance
--
Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94)
mail: echo zvpunry@xxxxxxxxxx | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
#bofh excuse 460: Here's a nickel, kid. Get yourself a better
computer.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: installation failed
- From: news.cogeco.ca
- Re: installation failed
- References:
- Re: installation failed
- From: news.cogeco.ca
- Re: installation failed
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux no threat to Microsoft
- Next by Date: Dual boot installation Q
- Previous by thread: Re: installation failed
- Next by thread: Re: installation failed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|