Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- From: Chris Cox <notccox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:20:17 -0500
dan.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Sorry for the extra traffic; I forgot that I had 250 GB disks in the
array instead of 400.
:)
I guess problem is solved then!! Numbers are accurate for a 250G
drive. You could go with a non-journaled fs and pick up 20-30M or so.
.
dan.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
How much overhead is ext3 supposed to take? I have a RAID1 array with
two 400 GB drives, but the output of df is:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md0 233G 214G 20G 92% /data
- References:
- ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- From: dan . nawrocki
- Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- From: dan . nawrocki
- ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- Prev by Date: Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- Next by Date: Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- Previous by thread: Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- Next by thread: Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- Index(es):