Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- From: Michael Heiming <michael+USENET@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:20:22 +0200
In comp.os.linux.setup dan.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxx:
dan.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
How much overhead is ext3 supposed to take? I have a RAID1 array with
two 400 GB drives, but the output of df is:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md0 233G 214G 20G 92% /data
[..]
Sorry for the extra traffic; I forgot that I had 250 GB disks
in the array instead of 400.
LOL...I had read your initial post and was really curious about
it. Big thx for coming back and clearing things up!
Good luck
--
Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94)
mail: echo zvpunry@xxxxxxxxxx | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
#bofh excuse 202: kernel panic: write-only-memory (/dev/wom0)
capacity exceeded.
.
- References:
- ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- From: dan . nawrocki
- Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- From: dan . nawrocki
- ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- Prev by Date: Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- Next by Date: Re: bad ISO's
- Previous by thread: Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- Next by thread: Re: ext3 overhead - switch to another fs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|