Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:46:48 -0500, Dave Uhring <daveuhring@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:13:17 -0700, mydejamai wrote:

Why can't some people respond to a question without being derogatory -
what is gained from it?

Since the documentation and answer to your question exist on both your own
Linux system and on the WWW, Usenet is an inappropriate place to display
your laziness.

For your info I first used Linux in the early 90s, when floppy disks
were the only to acquire it and the internet as we know it now didn't
exist.

This is also the first time I have heard of hier, inspite having used
Linux on and off for the past 8 years or so.

From the "early 90s" to 2006 is a good deal longer than "8 years or so".
If you cannot even perform such a simple subtraction perhaps you ought to
continue to use that Microsfot shitware you used to post your question.

It is also not a crime to learn about as much as is needed to perform a
task, which is how the majority of people approach technology and that
includes a fair number of technical people.

You did *not* ask how to perform a task. You slagged a file hierarchy
which you do not understand, one which is far more organized than that
spaghetti mess of Windows.

You also top-posted your response, a sure sign of one with no sense
whatever for netiquette.


Dave, relax or at least just keep it to yourself.
.

Quantcast