Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: AZ Nomad <aznomad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:41:03 GMT
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:44:22 -0500, Dave Uhring <daveuhring@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:09:51 +1000, Ron House wrote:
Dave Uhring wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:18:25 -0700, mydejamai wrote:
Why is Linux directory structure laid out so, what is the rationale
Why don't you read the man page for hier before asking such a dumb
question?
Why don't you take your civility pill each morning before you turn your
computer on? Maybe the question was a bit naive, but I've used linux
over a decade without knowing that there was a man page called hier, and
if I had known, I would not have guessed what was in it.
No need to guess; all you needed to do was type `man hier`. An
identically named man page exists in the BSDs while in Solaris the page
is named filesystem(5).
which of course leads to the next question, how the hell is anybody supposed
to know that?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Chris F Clark
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- References:
- Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: mydejamail
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Dave Uhring
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Ron House
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Dave Uhring
- Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Prev by Date: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Next by Date: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Next by thread: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|