Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:35:58 -0400
On 2006-09-21, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
On 2006-09-21, spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
mydejamail@xxxxxxxxxxx did eloquently scribble:
Why is Linux directory structure laid out so, what is the rationaleSimple.
Everything has its place rather than dumping things randomly around the hard
disk.
bin = binary
Rather, as [usr]/bin also contains scripts:
But when invented, shells were not what they are today.
True, but there were utilities which could be called by the shell
to do almost anything a modern shell can do. The shell has been a
useful programming language for more than 25 years.
bin \'bin\ n : a box, crib, or enclosure used for storage
sbin = "system" binary (things required to get the machine booted up and
other things for system monitoring and maintenance)
etc...
--
Chris F.A. Johnson, author | <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
Shell Scripting Recipes: | My code in this post, if any,
A Problem-Solution Approach | is released under the
2005, Apress | GNU General Public Licence
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- References:
- Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: mydejamail
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: spike1
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Chris F.A. Johnson
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Prev by Date: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Next by Date: Müslümbaba
- Previous by thread: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Next by thread: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|