Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: The Natural Philosopher <a@xxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:03:23 +0100
Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
On 2006-09-21, The Natural Philosopher wrote:Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:On 2006-09-21, spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:But when invented, shells were not what they are today.mydejamail@xxxxxxxxxxx did eloquently scribble:Rather, as [usr]/bin also contains scripts:
Why is Linux directory structure laid out so, what is the rationaleSimple.
Everything has its place rather than dumping things randomly around the hard
disk.
bin = binary
True, but there were utilities which could be called by the shell
to do almost anything a modern shell can do. The shell has been a
useful programming language for more than 25 years.
Unix goes furher back than that IIRC
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: John Hasler
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: spike1
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- References:
- Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: mydejamail
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: spike1
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Chris F.A. Johnson
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Chris F.A. Johnson
- Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Prev by Date: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Next by Date: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Next by thread: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|