Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Matt Giwer <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:40:04 GMT
Odie Ferrous wrote:
Matt Giwer wrote:
<snip useful info>
Thank you, Matt - as a relative newcomer myself, I found that
informative.
I thought of one more cruft. It might be an acronym for something like foo and bar.
Foo is fu and bar is bar. And fubar stands for fucked up beyond all recognition. Foobar was the successor of snafu.
--
They do not hate us for our freedom. They hate us for both Qana massacres.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3683
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
Iraqi democracy http://www.giwersworld.org/911/armless.phtml a3
.
- References:
- Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: mydejamail
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- From: Odie Ferrous
- Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Prev by Date: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Next by Date: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Next by thread: Re: Why complicated directory structure in Linux
- Index(es):