Re: Swap Partition
- From: The Natural Philosopher <a@xxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:30:54 +0000
Davide Bianchi wrote:
On 2007-01-14, John Thompson <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:It at lest keeps the machine running, and allows programs that are basically idle and not in use to be swapped out, rather than halting the machine totally.Ah. What do you do then when your RAM is maxxed out? Buy a new machine?
If you are running so many services that the physical machine can't
handle, then it is time you consider a bigger machine or spreading the
load over multiple machines, yes.
For those of us on a limited budget a swap partiion still has its place.
But is not the solution, is just a workaround. And anyway, the
'2xram size' rule isn't a rule at all. Never been.
Look at any process list, and there are always quite a few such programs..stuff that gets invoked only occasionally.
Davide.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Swap Partition
- From: Alan Adams
- Re: Swap Partition
- References:
- Swap Partition
- From: Francesco Barbuto
- Re: Swap Partition
- From: Scott
- Re: Swap Partition
- From: John Thompson
- Swap Partition
- Prev by Date: Re: Swap Partition
- Next by Date: Re: Swap Partition
- Previous by thread: Re: Swap Partition
- Next by thread: Re: Swap Partition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|