Re: Linux vx Sun
- From: The Natural Philosopher <a@xxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:49:05 +0100
Bob Martin wrote:
in 447293 20070911 084627 The Natural Philosopher <a@xxx> wrote:felmon davis wrote:On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:03:10 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:I don't know what the current attitude is.
Which is the actual answer,. Apart from that too similar to botherthat was a great summary (and terrible spelling)! thank you!
with.7 years ago Solaris for a PC was a tad more stable than Linux.
Today? Linux is more than good enough. Use it.
do people still say Windows is just a bootloader? doesn't that apply to
the Windows 9x days? not asking you to write a history of Windows (though
I would love to read it!) but just wondering about that bit.
Felmon
But Windows has had to add, with legacy ompatibility, all the multiuser
multitasking security and memory management stuff. NT was a brave
attempt to get it sorted, but it still wasn't stable.
OS/2 managed it and was very stable.
But that was IBM.
.
- References:
- Linux vx Sun
- From: zeno
- Re: Linux vx Sun
- From: Dave Uhring
- Re: Linux vx Sun
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: Linux vx Sun
- From: felmon davis
- Re: Copying a video cassette to DVD.
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Linux vx Sun
- From: Bob Martin
- Linux vx Sun
- Prev by Date: Re: udev and NIC devices
- Next by Date: Re: Linux vx Sun
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux vx Sun
- Next by thread: Re: Copying a video cassette to DVD.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|