Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- From: markhobley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Mark Hobley)
- Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:08:09 GMT
Matt Giwer <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I haven't been near Windows in years but it is my impression that NTFS is
more reliable that FAT32. Why don't you like it?
I prefer FAT32 over NTFS. Apart from the problem with NTFS being a
proprietary filesystem, I have seen some serious problems (on Microsoft
Windows based machines), where the filesystem locks everybody out,
preventing access to the files, including the Administrator accounts. On
at least three separate occasions it has been necessary for the system
administrator to format the drive and erase all the data, that would
have otherwise been recoverable had the drive been formatted FAT32. This
occured on third party machines running only Microsoft Windows XP. These
were just conventional installations with no security or drive
encryption being used. Microsoft Windows just crashes, requiring
reinstallation, and the drives become inaccessible, even when used as a
secondary drive on another machine for data recovery purposes.
Mark.
--
Mark Hobley
Linux User: #370818 http://markhobley.yi.org/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- References:
- USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- From: Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
- Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- From: Matt Giwer
- USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- Prev by Date: Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- Next by Date: Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- Previous by thread: Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- Next by thread: Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|